DaProcess of A Federal Investigation
 

Bioethics.gov

 
 

I have official documents which prove that when questioned by members of U.S. Congress the U.S. Marshals Service Office of Congressional Affairs willfully conspired in writing to contradict and deny the existence of an official internal affairs investigation. This investigation was documented as being conducted by the U.S. Marshals Service Office of Inspection (Internal Affairs Division).

This occured once in writing to U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer and twice in writing to U.S. Congressman Charles B. Rangel which constitutes making false statements in violation of federal statute:

Title 18 > Part I > Chapter 47 > § 1001 [LINK]
§ 1001. Statements or entries generally

I have validated my awareness of the law. I can also be prosecuted for willfully making false statements to federal law enforcement. I want to testify before a federal grand jury. As such I continue to request an investigation of the "U.S. Marshals Service" by the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime & Drugs. To date the Subcommittee has "refused" to respond to any of the numerous documented complaints which I have forwarded to them.

Mr. Reynolds
Mr. Reynolds
 

Open Government Initiative

 
 

"First Amendment freedoms are most in danger when the government seeks to control thought or to justify its laws for that impermissible end. The right to think is the beginning of freedom, and speech must be protected from the government because speech is the beginning of thought.

 
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy
 
 
 
 
OPEN GOVERNMENT INITIATIVE
 
 
 
 

You can review "all" of my detailed documented responses under [USDoJ Documents > Responses I]from the menu within my site.

Or

You can review the consolidated documents I received from the U.S. Department of Justice indicating "their" arbitrary & capricious responses under [USDoJ Documents > USDoJ Responses I] from the menu within my site.

 
 
 
DOWNLOAD [PDF]
 
 
 

If you are an employee of the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General or the Federal Bureau of Investigation what "you think occurred" is irrelevant. The "only" thing applicable is the documented facts as they have occurred in relation to federal statute of law.

If you continue to willfully ignore the documented false statements under federal statute of law you are in violation of federal statute:

Title 18> Part I> Chapter I> § 4 [LINK]
§ 4. Misprision of felony

[CLICK TO ENTER DAPROCESS
 
 

Office of Public Liaison